Strategic Plan for Preparedness, Vulnerability Reduction, and Resilience against Flood Risk; A Case Study of Kermanshah Province

Document Type : Article extracted From PhD dissertation

Authors

1 PhD Student of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

2 Full Professor of Architecture Department, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Floods are among the most hazardous natural disasters, directly threatening the safety and livelihoods of residents in settlements. In addition to causing significant social, economic, and environmental damages, floods pose a serious obstacle to sustainable development. Climate change and increasing weather variability have heightened the frequency and intensity of floods worldwide. Over the past five decades, the number of reported flood events has steadily risen, resulting in substantial economic losses. On average, one-third of natural disaster damages are flood-related, and about 95 percent of flood-related fatalities occur in developing countries.
The Purpose of the Research: The primary objective of this research is to develop a strategic plan to reduce flood risk in Kermanshah Province. This plan focuses on reducing vulnerability and enhancing the resilience of settlements by proposing effective measures to mitigate flood impacts. Kermanshah Province, due to its unique geographical and climatic characteristics, is highly prone to recurrent floods. Recent floods have caused extensive damage to various sectors, including agriculture and infrastructure.
Methodology: This research employs a descriptive-analytical approach, utilizing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) within a Geographic Information System (GIS) framework and the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis method. In the first step, flood risk and vulnerability zoning maps were created. Subsequently, by overlaying these maps, a crisis model was developed, and a flood risk reduction plan was formulated. Key factors influencing flood occurrence, such as vegetation cover, soil type, land use, slope, distance from rivers, rainfall, and topography, were identified and weighted.
Findings and Discussion: The findings of this study provide insights into the geographical, climatic, and vulnerability conditions of the region. On average, the slope of the land in the province is 21 percent, with steeper slopes primarily located in the northwest. Slope significantly affects the intensity and speed of floods; lower slopes increase the likelihood of water accumulation and flood risk. Central and elevated areas of the province experience higher rainfall, while the western regions receive minimal precipitation. Climate analyses indicate a rise in intense rainfall in recent years, directly increasing the probability of floods. The geological structure of Kermanshah Province is predominantly composed of sedimentary basins of the Zagros, and due to drought, plains and lowlands have become flood-prone areas. This situation has been exacerbated in recent years by reduced vegetation cover and increased human activities. Due to population and infrastructure concentration, the eastern half of the province is more vulnerable than the western half. Crisis maps highlight vulnerable areas, particularly around Kermanshah City, where high population density increases flood susceptibility.
To examine flood scenarios, four scenarios have been considered: first, river overflows that lead to damage to villages and infrastructure due to heavy rainfall; second, continuous rainfall that can lead to the inundation of plains and the encirclement of five villages; third, the effects of continuous rainfall in the folded areas and the Kermanshah plain; and fourth, combined scenarios that include a combined analysis of the first and second scenarios. The SWOT analysis identified 8 strengths, 11 weaknesses, 5 opportunities, and 7 threats. Strengths include human resources and infrastructure, while weaknesses involve a lack of equipment and public awareness. Opportunities for improving flood risk management were noted, alongside threats like climate change and population growth.
Conclusion: This research developed a strategic plan for flood risk reduction in Kermanshah Province using AHP-based GIS analysis and SWOT. The results indicate that the central and western regions face the highest flood risks, while the northwestern to southern areas are less vulnerable. Key factors contributing to flood risk include topography, rainfall intensity, and road density. Land use and proximity to rivers were also identified as critical factors. Strategic planning to mitigate flood impacts is essential, with public participation playing a crucial role. The study emphasizes collaboration among government agencies, researchers, and local communities for effective flood crisis management.
To reduce flood risk and vulnerability, four main strategies were proposed: growth, revision, confrontation, and defense. The defensive strategy, selected as the primary approach, includes reinforcing infrastructure, establishing emergency and medical centers, and improving energy transmission lines. Policies for building repairs, continuous infrastructure monitoring, and public education on flood preparedness were also recommended. These strategies aim to reduce damages and enhance the province's resilience to natural hazards.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Aghayary, L., Asghari Saraskanrood, S. & Zeinali, B. (2024). Identification and zoning of flood prone areas in Germi county. Journal of Geography and Planning, (), -.[In Persian]. doi: 10.22034/gp.2024.60493.3235
  2. Archer, D. R., & Fowler, H. J. (2018). Characterising flash flood response to intense rainfall and impacts using historical information and gauged data in Britain. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11. 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/JFR3.12187
  3. Atanga, R. A. (2020). The role of local community leaders in flood disaster risk management strategy making in Accra. International journal of disaster risk reduction43, 101358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101358
  4. Awah, L. S., Belle, J. A., Nyam, Y. S., & Orimoloye, I. R. (2024). A systematic analysis of systems approach and flood risk management research: trends, gaps, and opportunities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science15(1), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00544-y
  5. Babaei, B., Seyedian, S. M., & Toomaj, A. (2020). The Role of Flood Risk Management Approach on Resilience of Local communities (Case Study: Flooded villages of Gorgan-Rud watershed). Geographical Planning of Space, 10(36), 63-76. [In Persian]. doi: 10.30488/gps.2020.91920
  6. Cea, L., & Costabile, P. (2022). Flood risk in urban areas: Modelling, management and adaptation to climate change. A review. Hydrology9(3), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9030050
  7. Chen, J., Huang, G., & Chen, W. (2021). Towards better flood risk management: Assessing flood risk and investigating the potential mechanism based on machine learning models. Journal of environmental management, 293, 112810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.1128
  8. Country Management and Planning Organization. (2015). Dasht flood management guide. Recovered on December 14, 2024, of http://coactm.ir/wp-content/uploads [In Persian].
  9. Courty, L. G., Rico-Ramirez, M. Á., & Pedrozo-Acuña, A. (2018). The Significance of the Spatial Variability of Rainfall on the Numerical Simulation of Urban Floods. Water, 10(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020207
  10. Dieperink, C., Hegger, D. L., Bakker, M. H. N., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Green, C., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2016). Recurrent governance challenges in the implementation and alignment of flood risk management strategies: a review. Water Resources Management30, 4467-4481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1491-7
  11. Falconer, R. H., Cobby, D., Smyth, P., Astle, G., Dent, J., & Golding, B. (2009). Pluvial flooding: new approaches in flood warning, mapping and risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management2(3), 198-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01034.x
  12. Garrote, J., Peña, E., & Díez-Herrero, A. (2021). Probabilistic flood hazard maps from Monte Carlo derived peak flow values—An application to flood risk management in Zamora city (Spain). Applied Sciences11(14), 6629. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146629
  13. Ghadbeygi, M., Mazaheri, H., Shafiei, H., & Mardian, M. (2024). Urban flood risk management, a solution for the protection of ecosystems (Case study: Arak City). Ethnobiology and Biodiversity Conservation, 1(2), 38-50. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22091/ethc.2024.10558.1018
  14. Ghorbanzade, M., Azarakhshi, M., Mosaedi, A. & Rostami Khalaj, M. (2017). Evaluation of the efficiency of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to specify the areas with urban flood risk potential, case study: the central part of Torbat Heydarieh. Physical Geography Research, 49(4), 645-656. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22059/jphgr.2018.231371.1007037
  15. Kuhlicke, C., Seebauer, S., Hudson, P., Begg, C., Bubeck, P., Dittmer, C., ... & Bamberg, S. (2020). The behavioral turn in flood risk management, its assumptions and potential implications. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water7(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1418
  16. Kundzewicz, Z. W., Hegger, D. L. T., Matczak, P., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2018). Flood-risk reduction: Structural measures and diverse strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115(49), 12321-12325. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818227115
  17. Kundzewicz, Z. W., Szwed, M., & Pińskwar, I. (2019). Climate variability and floods—A global review. Water, 11(7), 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071399
  18. Lund, J. R. (2012). Flood Management in California. Water, 4(1), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.3390/w4010157
  19. Morrison, A., Westbrook, C. J., & Noble, B. F. (2018). A review of the flood risk management governance and resilience literature. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/JFR3.12315
  20. O'Donnell, E. C., & Thorne, C. R. (2020). Drivers of future urban flood risk. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A378(2168), 20190216. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0216
  21. Pathan, A. I., Girish Agnihotri, P., Said, S., & Patel, D. (2022). AHP and TOPSIS based flood risk assessment-a case study of the Navsari City, Gujarat, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment194(7), 509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10111-x
  22. J. (2019). Using modern methods in crisis management and urban flooding with emphasis on reducing damage and casualties (Case study: Simorgh County Flood, 2018). New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 4(12), 61-73. [In Persian]. https://www.majournal.ir/index.php/ma/article/view/355
  23. Rajabizadeh, Y., Ayoubzadeh, S. A., & Ghomeshi, M. (2019). Flood Survey of Khuzestan Province in 97-98 and Providing Solutions for its Control and Management in the Future. Ecohydrology, 6(4), 1069-1084. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22059/ije.2020.285854.1166
  24. Rentschler, J., Salhab, M., & Jafino, B. A. (2022). Flood exposure and poverty in 188 countries. Nature communications, 13(1), 3527. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30727-4
  25. Rosmadi, H. S., Ahmed, M. F., Mokhtar, M. B., & Lim, C. K. (2023). Reviewing Challenges of Flood Risk Management in Malaysia. Water, 15(13), 2390. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132390
  26. Sadeghloo, T. & Sojasi Qeidari, H. (2015). Flood hazard management strategies in rural area by SWOC-TOPSIS technique (Case study: Ghare – chai river basin of Ramyan province). Geography and Environmental Hazards, 3(4), 105-128. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22067/geo.v3i4.36491
  27. Saeedi Mofrad, S., & Asiaei, M. (2023). Flood risk zoning in Fariman city using fuzzy logic. Studies of
    Human Settlements Planning, 18(1), 283-298. [In Persian]. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jshsp/Article/1032024/FullText
  28. Salehi, E., Rafiei, Y., Farzad Behtash, M. R. & Aghababaei, M. T. (2013). Urban Flood Hazard Zonation Using GIS and Fuzzy-AHP Analysis (Case study: Tehran city). Environmental Studies, 39(3), 179-188. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22059/jes.2013.35901
  29. Shah, M. A. R., Rahman, A., & Chowdhury, S. H. (2018). Challenges for achieving sustainable flood risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management11, 352-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12211
  30. Solbi, M. A., Parsamehr, M. R., & Parsaei, T. (2021). Flood Mitigation Management. Tehran: Agricultural Education Publishing. [In Persian]. https://agrilib.areeo.ac.ir/book_9442.pdf
  31. Taheri, S. M. & Mosaedi, A. (2023). Review of Flood Risk Management Strategies and Legal and Practical Challenges. Water and Sustainable Development, 10(3), 35-50. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22067/jwsd.v10i3.2309-127
  32. Tariq, M. A. U. R., Farooq, R., & Van de Giesen, N. (2020). A critical review of flood risk management and the selection of suitable measures. Applied Sciences10(23), 8752. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238752
  33. Vafadarnikjoo, A., Chalvatzis, K., Botelho, T., & Bamford, D. (2023). A stratified decision-making model for long-term planning: Application in flood risk management in Scotland. Omega116, 102803. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2022.102803
  34. Wolf, J. (2008). Coastal flooding: impacts of coupled wave–surge–tide models. Natural Hazards, 49(2), 241-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9316-5
  35. Yang, T. H., & Liu, W. C. (2020). A General Overview of the Risk-Reduction Strategies for Floods and Droughts. Sustainability, 12(7), 2687. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072687