Analyzing the Role of Tehran's Space in Contemporary Social Events (a Case Study of the Islamic Revolution)

Document Type : Article extracted From PhD dissertation

Authors

1 Ph.D. student in Archaeology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Research and Art History, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: The city was born in the channel of geography and changes or dissolves over time under the influence of various factors. The way of coexistence of various classes and groups of society in every city is crystallized in the physical space of residential neighborhoods and the internal relationships between each component and the connection of each with other urban spaces.protest actions and revolutions are the result of confrontation between the government and new social movements in the urban space. The location of Tehran and the political and social concentration of movements in it have been the cause of various historical events in this city. In order to identify the political center and border of a government in social events, situational analysis studies should be done. In this approach, the dispersion of spaces and works in the landscape is a key to identify the political center and borders. Recognizing the effects of political activities of a government in archeological documents is possible through the examination and study of the territory and documents related to socio-political activities. The material manifestations of social factors in the formation of protest events have a direct relationship with the cultural works of humans and the social structure of urban spaces. The role of political competitions and protests in the formation of social actions in urban spaces is investigated and studied through urban archaeology. In archaeological data, which is related to society, there is a dialectical relationship between past and present. The way of placement of spaces, social groups and different cultures, in general the spatial organization and the constituent elements of the city are connected through communication. The quality of urban design and types of spaces have a great impact on the society. Discourse in the city can be understood as a form or a practice.
The purpose of the research: The purpose of the research is to analyze the relationship between the nature and goals of political and social events and the way Tehran's urban spaces are used in contemporary protest events (case study: Islamic Revolution).
Methodology: The method of this research is library (documents), field (visiting buildings) and with a descriptive-analytical approach.
Findings and discussion: In order to interpret the urban spaces and establish a connection between the protest event and the said spaces, the quantitative criteria of the space in terms of dimensions, the quality of connection with the surrounding context, and from the symbolic point of view, their connection with the structure of the whole city and the buildings around them are taken into consideration Has taken.
Conclusion: During the protests at the beginning of the Islamic Revolution, clerics of different times and strata played the most important role in the streets and urban spaces. The marches were held in Shahyad Square, 24 Esfand Square, Tehran University, Qaytarieh Hills and religious places of the city, which are among the most important urban spaces in this era. At the time of the 1957 revolution, due to the greater position and influence of religious people, especially clerics, and the leadership of Ayatollah Khomeini (RA), they were able to influence the target society. The difference between the use of urban spaces in this event and other events investigated in this research was in the type of welcoming, supporting and accepting the invitation of activists and protesters, and it led to the maximum use of important urban spaces. The relationship between spaces and spatial organizations with audiences and social interactions in the investigated events in the city of Tehran is two-way. During the investigated event, it was found that the spatial organization of the city of Tehran includes the government, civil and administrative headquarters, religious center, economic center and other urban elements with this event has been related.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Abrahamian, Y. (2012). Coup: August 28, CIA organization and the roots of Iran-US relations in the modern era. Translated by Mohammad Ebrahim Fatahi, Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian].
  2. Adibi, H. (1979). Iran's new middle class. Tehran: Society. [In Persian].
  3. Afshar, H., Khamse, Haydeh., & Bahramzadeh, M. (2019). Investigation of the religious architecture of religious minorities and their visibility in the context of the city of Tehran. Parse Archaeological Studies, 4(14), 185-203. [In Persian]. https://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-391-fa.html
  4. Algar, J. (1981). Iran's Islamic Revolution in 4 Speeches. Translated by Morteza Asaadi and Hassan Chizari, Tehran: Qalam. [In Persian].
  5. Arent, H. (1981). Revolution. Translated by Ezzatullah Fouladvand, Tehran: Kharazmi. [In Persian].
  6. Asadi, M., & Chizari, M. (1981). Islamic revolution in Iran. Tehran: Qalam. [In Persian] .
  7. Ashraf, A., & Banu Azizi, A. (2009). Social classes, government and revolution in Iran. Translated by Soheila Torabi Farsani, Tehran: Nilufar Publications. [In Persian].
  8. Atiqpour, M. (1979). The role of the market in the Iranian revolution. Tehran: Tehran printing house. [In Persian].
  9. Azari, N. (2010). A description of the concept of neighborhood and changes in neighborhoods. Journal of Urbanism Essays, 34, 1-37. [In Persian]. https://www.magiran.com/p915759
  10. Bamdad, M. (1978). Biography of Iranian men in the 12th to 14th centuries AH. Tehran: Hatef. [In Persian]
  11. Bashiriyeh, H. (2003). Obstacles to political development in Iran. Tehran: Gam No. [In Persian].
  12. Basiratmanesh, H., & Baseri, A. (2023). the role of urban marginals in the 1957 revolution (Case study of the slum dwellers of Tehran). Two Quarterly Journals of History of the Revolution, 6(2(11), 35-58. [In Persian]
  13. Bazargan, M. (1980). Iranian revolution in two movements. Tehran: Farhang Islamic Publishing House. [In Persian]
  14. Dolatabadi, Y. (1982). Yahya's life. Tehran: Attar and Ferdosi Publishing House. [In Persian]
  15. Eftekharzadeh, M. (1981). Imam Khomeini (May God bless him and grant him peace) is an eternal memory in history. Qom: Azadi. [In Persian].
  16. Elden, S. (2007). Understanding Henri Lefebvre: Theory and the Possible. London: Continuum.
  17. Ensafpour, G. (1980). The trend of national and Islamic movements. Tehran: Islamic Revolution Publishing and Education Organization. [In Persian].
  18. Esposito, J. (2008). Iranian revolution and reflection in the world. Translated by Mohsen Mirshanehchi, Tehran: Baz. [In Persian].
  19. Foran, J. (1997). The Comparative-Historical Sociology of Third World Social Revolutions. New York: Routledge.
  20. Ghasemi, A. (1978). History of Iran's National Front. Tehran: Iran Party. [In Persian].
  21. Goonewardena, K., Kipfer, S., Milgrom, R., & Schmid, C. (2008). Space, difference, everyday life. Reading Henri Lefebvre, Routledge.
  22. Graham, R. (1979). Iran Sarab Qodrat. translated by Firouz Firoznia, Tehran: Nashahab Kitab.
  23. Green, A. (2018). Introduction Urban Historical Archaeology: Challenging Ambivalence. In Cities in the World: 1500-2000: v. 3(pp. 1-13). Routledge.
  24. Habibi, S. M. (1997). City concept. Tehran: University of Tehran.
  25. Hakimi, M. (1978). Interpretation of the sun. Tehran: Islamic culture publishing house.
  26. Hoshang Mahdavi, A. (1993). Iran's revolution. Tehran: Tarh No. [In Persian]
  27. Javan, J., Dalil, S., & Salmani Moghadam, M. (2012). Lefebvre's Dialectic of Space. Quarterly Journal of Geographical Studies of Arid Regions, 4(12(12)), 1-17. [In Persian]. https://jargs.hsu.ac.ir/article_161329.html
  28. Karimian, H., & Ahmadi, A. (2014). space archaeology; Scientific approach in studying and analyzing architectural works, urban spaces and ancient textures. Archaeological Studies, 7(2), 103-116. [In Persian]. https://jarcs.ut.ac.ir/article
  29. Katoozian, M. (1981). A collection of essays on the Iranian revolution. Tehran: Sadaf. [In Persian]
  30. Kermani, N. A. (1978). History of Islamic Iran. Misplaced: Yaran. [In Persian]
  31. Keyhan Newspaper. (1979), 10670. Tehran: Keyhan Newspaper. [In Persian].
  32. Lefebvre, H. (2012). From the production of space. In Theatre and performance design(pp. 81-84). Routledge.
  33. Malekoutian, M., Baghaei, K., & Nayeri, H. (2012). Typology of Revolutionary Theories. Quarterly Journal of Politics, 42(1), 233-249. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2012.29943
  34. Masjed Jamei, A. (1982). Ideology and revolution. Tehran: Misplaced. [In Persian]
  35. Mohammadi, M. (1981). An analysis of the Islamic revolution. Tehran: Amir Kabir. [In Persian]
  36. Momeni, M. B. (1978). About Tudeh Movement and Party Issues, Tehran: Peyvand . [In Persian]
  37. Motahari, S. M. (1979). About the Islamic Revolution. Tehran: Islamic Publication Office. [In Persian]
  38. Motahari, S. M. (1979). collection. Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian]
  39. Mousavi, S. M. (2018). Causes of the Islamic Revolution of Iran; Why and How. Political Sociology of the Islamic Revolution, 1(1), 27-49. [In Persian]. https://www.psirj.ir/article_144932.html
  40. Parham, S. (1978). The Iranian Revolution and the foundations of Imam Khomeini's leadership. Tehran: Amir Kabir.
  41. Parsi, F., Mansouri, K., & Badri, N. (2010). Examining the social system in the structure of Iranian cities and explaining the place of neighborhoods as a social system that shapes the Qajar city. Published In The first national conference on Islamic architecture and urban planning. Tabriz. [In Persian]
  42. Riazi, S. A. (2009). the influence of modernity on the spatial organization of Tehran in the late Qajar period. Iranian Cultural Research Quarterly, 3(3(11)), 129-149. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.7508/ijcr.2010.11.006
  43. Rouhani, S. H. (1979). Analysis of the Imam Khomeini movement. Qum: Dar Al-Fakir.
  44. Sorush, A. (1978). Fatter than ideology. Tehran: Serat.
  45. Schmid, C. (2008). Henri Lefebvre’s theory of the production of space: Towards a three-dimensional dialectic. In Space, difference, everyday life(pp. 41-59). Routledge.