Explaining the Causes of Corruption in the Process of Renovating Inefficient Urban Fabrics (Case Study: District 10 of Tehran Municipality)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Master in Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

2 PhD in Urbanism, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Urban renewal, especially in inefficient urban fabrics, is a significant and complicated challenge in contemporary urban planning and this process involves addressing issues like deteriorating infrastructure, inadequate housing, and the socio-economic vulnerabilities of residents. Despite efforts by neighborhood development offices to improve these areas, corruption and bribery remain substantial obstacles. These malpractices not only erode public trust but also hinder the effectiveness of urban renewal initiatives. This research, focusing on District 10 of Tehran, aims to investigate these two main key questions: What are the factors contributing to corruption in the urban renewal process, and what is the current state of corruption within this district?
The Purpose of the Research: The primary objective of this study is to explore the systemic and contextual factors that lead to corruption in the renovation of inefficient urban fabrics, with a specific focus on District 10 of Tehran Municipality. The research aims to uncover the deeper structural and institutional causes that make the urban renewal process vulnerable to corrupt practices. By identifying these factors, the study seeks to lay the groundwork for targeted strategies and reforms to mitigate corruption. Additionally, the research contributes to the broader discourse on urban governance by highlighting how corruption can undermine urban renewal efforts and suggesting measures to enhance transparency and accountability.
Methodology: This research employs a qualitative approach, using grounded theory as its main methodological framework. The study follows Strauss and Corbin’s (1998) grounded theory method to systematically analyze collected data. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 participants, including managers from Tehran Municipality’s renovation offices, property owners, real estate agents, and developers. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved, ensuring a thorough understanding of the issues. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using MAXQDA software, with a coding process that involved open, axial, and selective coding. This process helped the research to identify the causal conditions, intervening conditions, interactions, and consequences contributing to corruption in the urban renewal process.
Findings and discussion: The study identifies a complex landscape of corruption, categorized into nine primary issues and 41 specific instances of corrupt practices, observed at three levels: structural, institutional, and micro. At the structural level, the research highlights deep-seated flaws within the urban planning framework, such as unclear guidelines and ambiguous regulations, which create opportunities for exploitation. Institutional corruption is driven by conflicting interests among stakeholders, including developers, municipal officials, and real estate agents, who often engage in collusion to maximize their gains at the public’s expense. Micro-level corruption involves direct interactions between individuals, characterized by bribery and manipulation in property transactions and contract negotiations.
A key insight from the research is the identification of a "corruptible planning structure" that affects all levels of the urban renewal process. This structure is characterized by a lack of transparency, weak enforcement of regulations, and inadequate accountability mechanisms. The study also finds that multiple power centers within the municipality, each pursuing its own agenda, exacerbate the problem by creating a fragmented governance environment where corruption thrives. Additionally, the research highlights the role of social and economic pressures, such as the scarcity of affordable housing and the high stakes in real estate development, as significant drivers of corruption in District 10.
Conclusion: The research concludes that the roots of corruption in Tehran Municipality’s urban renewal processes, particularly in District 10, are deeply embedded in structural and institutional flaws. These issues are not isolated but part of a broader systemic problem requiring comprehensive reforms. To address these challenges, the research suggests several key interventions: establishing more robust oversight mechanisms, implementing clearer and more transparent regulatory frameworks, and promoting greater community involvement in planning and decision-making. The study also calls for a reevaluation of current urban renewal strategies to ensure they align with principles of good governance and public accountability.
In summary, this research provides an in-depth examination of the factors contributing to corruption in the urban renewal process in District 10 of Tehran. It emphasizes the urgent need for systemic reforms to address these issues and offers practical recommendations for policymakers and urban planners. By tackling the root causes of corruption, the study aims to contribute to the development of more effective and equitable urban renewal policies that better serve all stakeholders.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Abedi Jafari, H., Taherpoor Kalantari, H., Zarandi, S., & Aghazadeh dahdah, F. (2019). Identifying the Individual Factors Affecting the Tendency to Corruption in Tehran Municipality. Organizational Behaviour Studies Quarterly8(1), 49-74. [In Persian]. https://obs.sinaweb.net/article_35603.html
  2. Afzali, A. (2012). Official Corruption and Its Effect on Development: Causes and Solutions. International Law Review, 28(45), 235-264. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22066/cilamag.2011.16961
  3. Aghazadeh, F., Abedi Jafari, H., Taherpour-Kalantari, H., & Zarandi, S. (2018). Developing a Causal Model of Administrative Corruption in Tehran Municipality Regions. Journal of Management Development and Planning (JMDP), 31(3), 3-48. [In Persian]. http://jmdp.ir/article-1-3092-fa.html
  4. Ashrafi, A., Iravanian, A., & Hooshyar, M. (2021). Bribery and personal bribery between national and Iranian law. Journal of Criminal Law Research, 10(36), 261-286. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22054/jclr.2021.44331.1947
  5. Beheshty, S. S., & Khanmohammadi, E. (2020). Investigating the Status of Perceptions of Corruption and Related Factors in Sarpol-e-Zahab City. Journal of Applied Sociology31(4), 45-72. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22108/jas.2020.113537.1517
  6. Bromley, R. D. F., Tallon, A. R., & Thomas, C. J. (2005). City centre regeneration through residential development: Contributing to sustainability. Urban Studies, 42(13), 2407–2429.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980500379537
  7. Chan, A. P., & Owusu, E. K. (2017). Corruption Forms in the Construction Industry: Literature Review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce, 143, 04017057. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943 7862.0001353
  8. Egolum, C. C., & Emoh, F. I. (2017). The issues and challenges of urban renewal in a developing economy. International journal of development and economic sustainability, 5(1), 32-44.
  9. Ezzati, M., & Karimi Golnar, B. (2014). Designing an Indigenous Index for Measuring Economic Corruption. Strategic and Macro Policies, 2(6), 57-86. [In Persian]. https://www.jmsp.ir/article_7363.html
  10. Giommoni, T. (2021). Exposure to corruption and political participation: Evidence from Italian municipalities. European Journal of Political Economy, 68, 102008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102000
  11. Hosseini, M. R., Martek, I., Banihashemi, S., Chan, A. P. C., Darko, A., & Tahmasebi, M. (2020). Distinguishing characteristics of corruption risks in Iranian construction projects: A weighted correlation network analysis. Sci. Eng, 26, 205–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00089-0
  12. Heywood, P. (1997). Political Corruption. Tehran: Research Institute of Strategic Studies.
  13. Joodi Piranfar, M. (2015). Pathology of Urban Renewal Service Offices. Deputy of Studies and Planning of Social and Cultural Affairs, Tehran Municipality. [In Persian]. https://magiran.com/p1368010
  14. Karimi, A., Ghaderi, S., & Hemati, B. (2023). Analysis of the Formation of Corruptive Grounds in Tehran Social Studies and Research in Iran, 12(1), 187-202. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22059/jisr.2023.336431.129
  15. Kermani, A. A., & Jafari, M. H. (2016). Investigating Types of Administrative Corruption. In Third National Conference on Law: Contexts of Financial and Administrative Corruption in Iran’s Legal System with an Approach to Reform and Development of the Legal System, Meybod. [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/641395/
  16. Liu, Z., Chi, Z., Osmani, M., & Demian, P. (2021). Blockchain and building information management (BIM) for sustainable building development within the context of smart cities. Sustainability, 13(4), 2090. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13042090
  17. Locatelli, G., Mariani, G., Sainati, T., & Greco, M. (2017). Corruption in public projects and megaprojects: There is an elephant in the room! International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 252-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.09.00
  18. García-Hernández, M., De la Calle-Vaquero, M., & Yubero, C. (2017). Cultural heritage and urban tourism: Historic city centres under pressure. Sustainability9(8), 1346. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9081346
  19. Nye, J. S. (1967). Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. American Political Science Review61(2), 417-427. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953254
  20. Rostami, V., Kabgani, H., & Talebizadeh, M. (2017). Investigating Causes of Administrative Corruption and Methods of Prevention. Rahyafte Pishgiri Journal, 2. [In Persian]. http://noo.rs/7vPWs
  21. Sadeghzadeh, S., Golkar, K., Ghafari, A., & Lak, A. (2020). The Experience on the Decision-making Process of Urban Design Projects. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 12(25), 63-84. SID. doi: 20.1001.1.27171299.1398.12.25.4.0
  22. Shahraki, A. A. (2022). Renovation programs in old and inefficient neighborhoods of cities with case studies. City, Territory and Architecture, 9(28). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40410-022-00174-1
  23. Siahkali Moradi, J., Ghorban Alizadeh, R., & Esmaeili, S. (2020). Combating Administrative Corruption through Renovation and Transformation in Administrative Structure: A Study of the New Argentine Government’s Actions. Journal of Islamic Humanities Studies, 6(22). [In Persian]. http://johi.ir/user/articles/752
  24. World Bank. (2012). Worldwide governance indicators: Country data report for Iran. Retrieved from worldbank.org/wbi/governance/
  25. Zebardast, E., & Mirzaei, M. R. (2020). Identifying and Ranking the Challenges of Urban Renewal Management (Case Study: District 10 of Tehran Municipality). Urban Economics and Management, 8(2), 105-128. [In Persian]. http://iueam.ir/article-1-1416-fa.html