جنسیت و ادراک امنیت در پارک‌های محلی ( نمونه موردی: باغ فیض تهران)

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد طراحی شهری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران.

2 مربی دانشگاه، دانشکده معماری، دانشگاه هنر ایران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مقدمه: امنیت فضاهای عمومی برای گروه‌های مختلف جامعه یکسان نیست. مطالعات نشان می‌دهند که زنان در این فضاها احساس ناامنی بیشتری را نسبت به مردان تجربه می‌کنند. این تفاوت در ادراک امنیت می‌تواند بر نحوه استفاده از پارک‌ها و مشارکت اجتماعی تأثیر بگذارد.
هدف پژوهش: این پژوهش به بررسی نقش جنسیت در تفاوت ادراک حس امنیت در پارک‌های محلی می‌پردازد. جنسیت در ارتباط با شش عامل کلیدی تعیین کننده احساس امنیت موردتوجه قرار گرفت تا مشخص شود کدامیک از این عوامل برای زنان اهمیت بیشتری دارد.
روش‌شناسی: این مطالعه از نوع توصیفی-تحلیلی با رویکرد پیمایشی است و داده‌ها از طریق پرسشنامه‌ جمع‌آوری شدند. جامعه آماری شامل ۱۷۰ نفر از کاربران شش پارک محلی در محله باغ فیض تهران است که با روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. پرسشنامه شامل عوامل مؤثر بر ادراک امنیت پارک‌ها است: قابلیت رؤیت‌پذیری، نگهداری، پاکیزگی، حفاظت خارجی، سایر کاربران و امکانات حرکتی. داده‌ها با استفاده از آمار توصیفی و آزمون تی مستقل برای بررسی تفاوت‌های میان زنان و مردان تحلیل شد.
یافته‌ها و بحث: زنان نسبت به مردان حساسیت بیشتری نسبت به عوامل شکل‌دهنده حس امنیت در پارک‌های محلی دارند و میانگین ادراک امنیت آن‌ها در اکثر عوامل بالاتر از مردان است. هشت عامل (روز روشن، نورپردازی مصنوعی، امکان دیده‌شدن و دیدن دیگران، گشت‌های پلیس، نظارت ویدیویی، وضعیت تجهیزات، مسیرهای پارک و حضور کاربران مزاحم) به‌عنوان مهم‌ترین عوامل امنیتی شناسایی شدند. تفاوت آماری در ادراک کلی امنیت بین زنان و مردان مشاهده نشد، اما تفاوت‌های معنادار جنسیتی در سطح عوامل خاص آشکار شد. همچنین، ویژگی‌های مکانی پارک‌ها، تأثیر قابل توجهی بر ادراک امنیت زنان داشتند.
نتیجه‌گیری: ادراک امنیت زنان در پارک‌های شهری تحت تأثیر طیف وسیعی از عوامل کالبدی، محیطی و اجتماعی قرار دارد. امنیت موضوعی است که به عنوان ماهیتی چندبعدی و پیوسته باید موردتوجه طراحان و برنامه‌ریزان و مدیران شهری قرار داشته باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Gender and Safety Perception in Local Parks (Case Study: Bagh-e-Feyz, Tehran)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahkameh Rezaeisalim 1
  • Ahmad Mortazavi 2
1 Master of Urban Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
2 University Lecturer, Faculty of Architecture, Iran University of Art, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Safety in public spaces is not experienced equally by all social groups, particularly women. Numerous studies have indicated that women often perceive higher levels of insecurity in public areas compared to men. This disparity in safety perception can profoundly influence how local parks are used and the degree of social participation among different demographic groups. Public parks play a vital role in urban life, providing spaces for recreation, relaxation, physical activity, and social interaction. However, if women perceive these areas as unsafe, their use of parks is significantly reduced, potentially limiting their social engagement and overall well-being. Therefore, understanding gender-based differences in safety perception is essential for urban planners, designers, and policymakers aiming to create inclusive, accessible, and equitable public spaces that encourage participation across all social groups. Moreover, exploring these differences contributes to broader knowledge of how environmental, social, and managerial factors interact to shape users’ perceptions and behaviors in urban contexts.
 
The Purpose of the Research: The primary objective of this research is to investigate the role of gender in shaping differences in safety perception within local parks, specifically focusing on Bagh-e-Feyz, a neighborhood in Tehran. The study aims to examine how gender interacts with six key factors that determine perceived safety, to identify which elements are more significant for women. By understanding these factors, planners can design targeted strategies to improve safety perceptions and encourage broader public use of local parks. This investigation also seeks to provide evidence on whether gender differences manifest in overall safety perception or primarily at the level of specific environmental and social factors.
 
Methodology: This study employs a descriptive-analytical design with a survey-based approach. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire administered to 170 park users, consisting of 85 women and 85 men, across six local parks in Bagh-e-Feyz, Tehran. Participants were selected through simple random sampling to ensure a representative sample. The questionnaire included six categories of factors affecting safety perception in parks: visibility, maintenance, cleanliness, external protection, presence and behavior of other users, and mobility facilities. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted to summarize respondents’ perceptions, and independent t-tests were used to examine differences between men and women for each factor. This methodological approach enables the identification of nuanced gender-based differences in perceived safety, providing insights for evidence-based urban planning interventions.
 
Findings and Discussion: The analysis revealed that women exhibit greater sensitivity to factors influencing safety perception compared to men. In most categories, women’s mean scores for perceived safety were higher than those of men, indicating greater attention to environmental cues and potential risks. Eight factors were identified as particularly influential: daylight, artificial lighting, visibility and ability to observe others, police patrols, video surveillance, condition of park equipment, design and layout of pathways, and presence of disruptive users. While no statistically significant difference was observed in overall safety perception between women and men, significant gender differences emerged at the level of specific factors, highlighting the importance of examining safety perception in a multidimensional manner. Additionally, spatial characteristics of parks had a significant impact on women’s perceptions, and the pattern of park occupancy further revealed gender-related differences. These results suggest that safety perception is shaped not only by environmental and managerial elements but also by a combination of social, behavioral, and contextual factors that function together as an interconnected system. Understanding these interactions allows urban planners to address women’s concerns more effectively and enhance overall park accessibility and usability.
 
Conclusion: Women’s safety perception in local parks is influenced by a complex interplay of physical, environmental, and social factors. Their multidimensional sensitivity is particularly associated with mobility facilities, maintenance, cleanliness, equipment condition, and the behavior of other users. Consequently, safety should be considered as a continuous, multidimensional concept in urban planning and design. Effective interventions must address multiple elements simultaneously, including environmental design, active management, and social supervision. By recognizing and responding to women’s safety concerns, urban planners can foster more inclusive, welcoming, and usable public spaces, thereby promoting equitable access, encouraging social participation, and enhancing urban quality of life. Ultimately, improving women’s perception of safety contributes to broader societal benefits by supporting active engagement in public life and reinforcing the role of parks as essential urban spaces for all citizens.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Safety Perception
  • Local Parks
  • Fear Factors
  • Gender
  • Bagh-e-Feyz
  • Tehran
  1. Adışönmez, U. C. (2016). What is the Human Security Approach and How the Phenomenon Contributed to the International Security Agenda: Canadian and Japanese Paradigms. GSD Journal, 24, 1–22. https://gsd.msu.edu.tr/Content/sayilar/dokuman/GSD_24/GSD_24_Art_1_122016.pdf
  2. Baur, J. W. R. (2018). Urban Green Spaces, Recreation and Spiritual Experiences. Leisure/Loisir, 42(2), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2018.1449131
  3. Bedimo-Rung, A. L., Mowen, A. J., & Cohen, D. A. (2005). The Significance of Parks to Physical Activity and Public Health: A Conceptual Model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.024
  4. Chen, S., Lin, S., Yao, Y., & Zhou, X. (2024). Urban Public Space Safety Perception and the Influence of the Built Environment from A Female Perspective: Combining Street View Data and Deep Learning. Land13(12), 2108. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122108
  5. Chiesura, A. (2004). The Role of Urban Parks for the Sustainable City. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003
  6. Corti, B., Donovan, R., & Holman, C. (1996). Factors Influencing the Use of Physical Activity Facilities: Results from Qualitative Research. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 6(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.461582631812285
  7. Cozens, P. M., Saville, G., & Hillier, D. (2005). Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED): A Review and Modern Bibliography. Property Management, 23(5), 328–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637470510631483
  8. Cullen, F. T., & Wilcox, P. (2010). Encyclopedia of Criminological Theory. Sage.
  9. Fotios, S. A., Unwin, J., & Farrall, S. (2015). Road Lighting and Pedestrian Reassurance After Dark: A Review. Lighting Research & Technology, 47(4), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153514524587
  10. Hilborn, J. (2009). Dealing with Crime and Disorder in Urban Parks. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
  11. Iqbal, A., & Ceccato, V. (2015). Does Crime in Parks Affect Apartment Prices?. Journal of Scandinavian studies in criminology and crime prevention16(1), 97-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14043858.2015.1009674
  12. Iqbal, A., & Ceccato, V. (2016). Is CPTED Useful to Guide the Inventory of Safety in Parks? A Case Study in Stockholm, Sweden. International Criminal Justice Review, 26(2), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567716639353
  13. Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House.
  14. Jauregui, C., Trinidad, A., & Vozmediano, L. (2025). Women's Safety Perception Before and After the Reconstruction of An Urban Area: A Mixed-Method Research. Violence Against Women.
  15. Jorgensen, A., & Anthopoulou, A. (2007). Enjoyment and Fear in Urban Woodlands – Does Age Make A Difference?. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.05.004
  16. Kuo, F. E., Bacaicoa, M., & Sullivan, W. C. (1998). Transforming Inner-city Landscapes. Environment and Behavior, 30(1), 28–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916598301002
  17. Lindberg, M., & Schipperijn, J. (2015). Active Use of Urban Park Facilities – Expectations versus Reality. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(4), 909–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.08.007
  18. Maas, J., Spreeuwenberg, P., van Winsum-Westra, M., Verheij, R. A., de Vries, S., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2009). Is Green Space in the Living Environment Associated with People’s Feelings of Social Safety?. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(7), 1763–1777. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4196
  19. Mahrous, A. M., Mustafa, Y. M., & Abou El-Ela, M. A. (2018). Physical Characteristics and Perceived Security in Urban Parks: Investigation in the Egyptian Context. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), 3055–3066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.04.016
  20. Mak, B. K. L., & Jim, C. Y. (2018). Linking Park Users’ Socio-demographic Characteristics and Visit-related Preferences to Satisfaction with Urban Green Spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 31, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.001
  21. Maller, C., Townsend, M., St Leger, L., Henderson-Wilson, C., Pryor, A., Prosser, L., & Moore, M. (2009). Healthy Parks, Healthy People: The Health Benefits of Contact with Nature in A Park Context. In The George Wright Forum, George Wright Society.
  22. Marcus, C. C., & Francis, C. (1997). People Places: Design Guidlines for Urban Open Space. John Wiley & Sons.
  23. McCormack, G. R., Rock, M., Toohey, A. M., & Hignell, D. (2010). Characteristics of Urban Parks Associated with Park Use and Physical Activity: A Review of Qualitative Research. Health & Place, 16(4), 712–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003
  24. Mehta, V. (2014). Evaluating Public Space. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 53–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698
  25. Mullaney, J., Lucke, T., & Trueman, S. J. (2015). A Review of Benefits and Challenges in Growing Street Trees in Paved Urban Environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.013
  26. Nasar, J. L., & Fisher, B. (1993). ‘Hot Spots’ of Fear and Crime: A Multi-method Investigation. Journal of environmental psychology13(3), 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80173-2
  27. Peters, K., Elands, B., & Buijs, A. (2010). Social Interactions in Urban Parks: Stimulating Social Cohesion?. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.11.003
  28. Pfisterir, M. (2002). Understanding Crime and Perceptions of Safety in Providence’s Parks. Undergraduate thesis, Brown University, Center for Environmental Studies.
  29. Polko, P., & Kimic, K. (2022). Gender As A Factor Differentiating the Perceptions of Safety in Urban Parks. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13, 101608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.09.032
  30. Rotem-Mindali, O. (2025). Gender Differences in Pedestrian Safety Perceptions: The Physical and Digital Spheres. Travel Behaviour and Society, 41, 101103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101103
  31. Sadeghi, A. R., Mousavi Sarvine Baghi, E. S., Shams, F., & Jangjoo, S. (2023). Women in A Safe and Healthy Urban Environment: Environmental Top Priorities for the Women’s Presence in Urban Public Spaces. BMC Women’s Health, 23(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02281-8
  32. Sreetheran, M., & Van Den Bosch, C. C. K. (2014). A Socio-ecological Exploration of Fear of Crime in Urban Green Spaces–A Systematic Review. Urban forestry & urban greening13(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.11.006
  33. Telep, C. W., & Weisburd, D. (2012). What is Known about the Effectiveness of Police Practices in Reducing Crime and Disorder?. Police Quarterly, 15(4), 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611112447611
  34. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through A Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery. science224(4647), 420-421. https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.6143402
  35. Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban Green Space, Public Health and Environmental Justice: The Challenge of Making Cities ‘Just Green Enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
  36. Wu, K. C., & Song, L. Y. (2017). A Case for Inclusive Design: Analyzing the Needs of Those Who Frequent Taiwan’s Urban Parks. Applied Ergonomics, 58, 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.015
  37. Zhu, J., Lu, H., Zheng, T., Rong, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, W., ... & Tang, L. (2020). Vitality of Urban Parks and Its Influencing Factors from the Perspective of Recreational Service Supply, Demand, and Spatial Links. International journal of environmental research and public health17(5), 1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051615
  38. Zysk, E. (2024). Identification of Determinants that Reduce Women’s Safety and Comfort in Urban Public Spaces (UPS). Sustainability, 16(22), 10075. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210075