عوامل کلیدی مؤثر بر توسعه شهری شهرهای کوچک باتوجه‌به شاخص‌های شهر بیوفیلیک (مورد مطالعه: شهر تازیان پائین)

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده معماری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، میناب، ایران.

2 کارشناسی ارشد معماری، دانشکده معماری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، میناب، ایران.

چکیده

مقدمه: طراحی بیوفیلیک به‌عنوان رویکردی طبیعت‌محور در توسعه شهری، تلاشی برای بازگرداندن پیوند میان انسان و طبیعت در بسترهای شهری است. این رویکرد می‌تواند از طریق حفظ تعادل اکولوژیکی، کاهش آلودگی، بهبود کیفیت فضاهای عمومی و ارتقای سرمایه اجتماعی، به تحقق پایداری زیست‌محیطی و اجتماعی در شهرهای کوچک کمک کند. با توجه ‌به رشد بی‌رویه جمعیت شهری و فشارهای فزاینده بر منابع طبیعی، استفاده از اصول طراحی بیوفیلیک در شهرهای کوچک اهمیت دوچندانی می‌یابد.
هدف پژوهش: این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی و تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه طراحی بیوفیلیک در شهرهای کوچک و بررسی نقش این رویکرد در بهبود شاخص‌های پایداری شهری انجام شده است. مطالعه‌موردی این پژوهش شهر تازیان پائین در بندرعباس است که با چالش‌هایی همچون کمبود فضای سبز، بهره‌برداری بی‌رویه از منابع طبیعی و ضعف در مشارکت اجتماعی مواجه است.
روش‌شناسی: روش تحقیق حاضر ترکیبی از تکنیک دلفی برای گردآوری نظرات خبرگان و تحلیل اثرات متقاطع برای شناسایی متغیرهای کلیدی است. متغیرهای کلیدی شامل توسعه پیاده‌راه‌ها و مسیرهای سبز، طراحی المان‌های بومی با الهام از طبیعت، افزایش مشارکت شهروندان در پروژه‌های زیست‌محیطی و جذب سرمایه در گردشگری طبیعت‌محور شناسایی و تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها و بحث: نتایج نشان می‌دهد که برای توسعه طراحی بیوفیلیک در شهرهای کوچک، تقویت ظرفیت‌های نهادی، بودجه‌گذاری هدفمند و برنامه‌ریزی مشارکتی ضروری است. توسعه فضاهای عمومی سبز و ارتقای تنوع زیستی می‌تواند نقش مهمی در بهبود کیفیت زندگی ایفا کند. همچنین بهره‌گیری از مصالح بومی و فناوری‌های سازگار با محیط‌زیست در فرایند طراحی، موجب کاهش اثرات منفی توسعه شهری می‌شود.
نتیجه‌گیری: این پژوهش بیان می‌کند که رویکرد بیوفیلیک نه‌تنها ابزاری برای ارتقای کیفیت محیط شهری است، بلکه می‌تواند مسیر تحقق پایداری زیست‌محیطی و اجتماعی در شهرهای کوچک را هموار سازد. در نهایت، پیشنهاد می‌شود که سیاست‌گذاران شهری با تدوین راهبردهایی جامع، زمینه‌ را برای تقویت ارتباط انسان و طبیعت در شهرهای کوچک فراهم کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Key Factors Influencing Urban Development of Small Cities Based on Biophilic City Indicators (Case Study: Tazian-e Paeen)

نویسندگان [English]

  • vahid sohrabi 1
  • Kamran Vahedi 2
1 PhD of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Minab, Iran.
2 Master of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Minab, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Biophilic design, as a nature-oriented paradigm in urban development, offers a meaningful strategy to restore the weakened relationship between people and the natural environment in cities. By integrating natural patterns, local materials, and ecological processes into the built environment, this approach helps reduce alienation, support mental and physical health, and create a stronger sense of place. Its value is particularly evident in small cities, where limited resources, fragile ecosystems, and weak institutional capacities often intensify the impacts of growth, pollution, and environmental stress. In such contexts, biophilic design contributes to maintaining ecological balance, mitigating emissions, improving the quality of public spaces, and strengthening social capital through community stewardship of nature. These benefits gain urgency as urban populations rise and pressures on land, water, and biodiversity increase.
Purpose of the Study: The study aims to identify and analyze the key factors influencing the development of biophilic design in small cities and to assess its impact on urban sustainability indicators. It examines the interaction between institutional capacity, community engagement, and ecological considerations in promoting nature-oriented urban strategies. By focusing on a small city with distinct environmental and social challenges, the research provides practical insights for policymakers and urban planners seeking to implement biophilic approaches that enhance sustainability and resilience.
Methodology: This research adopts a mixed-methods approach that combines the Delphi technique and cross-impact analysis to identify and prioritize critical variables affecting biophilic design implementation. Expert opinions from urban planners, architects, and environmental specialists were collected in two rounds of Delphi surveys to ensure consensus on the most significant factors. The case study of Tazian-e Paeen, a small city located in Bandar Abbas, Iran, was chosen due to its distinct challenges, such as limited green spaces, overexploitation of natural resources, and low levels of citizen participation in environmental projects. Key variables identified and analyzed include the development of pedestrian-friendly green pathways, design of context-sensitive and nature-inspired urban elements, promotion of citizen participation in environmental initiatives, and attracting investment in eco-tourism.
Findings and Discussion: The analysis reveals that successful implementation of biophilic design in small cities requires strengthening institutional capacities, targeted budget allocation, and participatory planning processes. The creation of public green spaces and the preservation of biodiversity emerged as critical factors for improving urban residents’ quality of life. Furthermore, utilizing locally sourced and environmentally friendly materials in urban projects can mitigate the negative impacts of urban development on natural ecosystems. The findings highlight that public awareness and education campaigns are essential to encourage active citizen participation, which in turn fosters a sense of ownership and responsibility toward the urban environment. Importantly, the study suggests that integrating biophilic principles into existing urban plans requires adaptive governance structures capable of balancing economic development with ecological preservation. In the case of Tazian-e Paeen, the study identified specific opportunities for integrating biophilic elements, such as converting underutilized urban spaces into small-scale urban forests, designing culturally inspired water features that enhance microclimate regulation, and developing eco-tourism routes that highlight the city’s natural and cultural heritage. These strategies are expected to address current urban challenges, including heat island effects, air pollution, and loss of local identity.
Conclusion: This study underscores the transformative potential of biophilic design as a tool to enhance environmental and social sustainability in small cities. Beyond improving the aesthetic and ecological quality of urban spaces, biophilic design fosters stronger social ties and enhances residents’ psychological well-being. The research concludes that the success of biophilic urban strategies depends on multi-dimensional planning that incorporates institutional support, financial mechanisms, and community engagement. Policymakers are advised to develop comprehensive strategies that integrate biophilic principles at various urban scales, from neighborhood-level interventions to city-wide policies. By doing so, small cities like Tazian-e Paeen can create healthier, more resilient urban environments that are better equipped to face the challenges of rapid urbanization and climate change. Finally, the study recommends further research on quantifying the socio-economic and ecological benefits of biophilic design in different urban contexts. Future studies could also explore the role of digital tools and smart technologies in facilitating the design and monitoring of biophilic interventions. Overall, this research contributes to the growing body of literature emphasizing the need to reconnect urban development with nature, offering a practical pathway toward sustainable and livable small cities.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Urban development
  • small towns
  • biophilic
  • Tazian-e Paeen
  1. Arof, K. Z. M., Ismail, S., Najib, N. H., Amat, R. C., & Ahmad, N. H. B. (2020). Exploring opportunities of adopting biophilic cities concept into mixed-use development project in Malaysia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing.
  2. Bakhshi, M. R. , Pirdadeh Bayranvand, K. & Falaki, M. (2017). Investigating the Relationship between Social Capital and Environmental Behaviors of Students in University of Birjand. Social Capital Management4(3), 451-473. [In Persian] doi: 10.22059/jscm.2018.239044.1432
  3. Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic cities: integrating nature into urban design and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  4. Beatley, T. (2016). Handbook of biophilic city planning & design. London: Island Press.
  5. Beatley, T., & Newman, P. (2013). Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities. Sustainability, 5(8), 3328-3345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083328
  6. Bitaraf, E., & Habib, F. (2018). Localization of ecological and biophilic architecture principles in the design of Iranian residential complexes to improve their quality. Urban and Rural Management Journal, 17(52), 205–218. [In Persian] https://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-2314-fa.html
  7. Cook, E. A. (2016). Biophilic urbanism: Making cities sustainable through ecological design. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Architecture and Sustainable Development (CASD-2016), https://doi.org/10.15242/IICBE.DIR1216404
  8. Dideban, M., & Kakavand, A. (2019). Biophilic Architecture, a Strategy for Increasing the Environmental Quality of Residential Complexes. Published in Third National Conference on Modern Academic Research in Art, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Tehran. [In Persian] https://civilica.com/doc/1255168
  9. Ebrahimpour, M. (2020). Biophilic planning: A new approach to achieving livability in Iran’s new towns (Case study: Hashtgerd New Town). Environmental Planning, 13(50), 39–59. [In Persian] https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/ebtp/Article/987631
  10. Ezzati, E., Maeiti, J., & Mortezaei, Sh. (2017). Analysis and planning of comprehensive tourism development with emphasis on ecotourism and urban landscape by presenting a strategic and security model in Astara. New Perspectives in Human Geography, 10(1), 197–221. [In Persian] https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/1018438
  11. Fattouhi Mehrabani, B., & Hataminejad, H. (2018). Biophilic city: A new approach to the environmental sustainability of cities. In Proceedings of the First Conference on Competitiveness and Future of Urban Developments, Tehran. [In Persian] https://civilica.com/doc/816027
  12. Ghorbani Param, M. R., Bavar, S., & Mahmoudinejad, H. (2020). Evaluation of the impact of biophilic architecture principles on housing design quality in the northern climate of Iran (Case study: Gorgan city). New Perspectives in Human Geography, 12(2), 405–424. [In Persian] https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/geography/Article/860019/FullText
  13. Grundy, Q. (2021). A politics of objectivity: biomedicine’s attempts to grapple with “non-financial” conflicts of interest. Science and Engineering Ethics27(3), 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00315-8
  14. Jalaliyan, E., Tardast, Z. & Waysian, M. (2020). Explaining the Biosafety Citizen Pattern (Case Study: 9th and 10th District of Tehran Metropolis). Human Geography Research, 52(3), 993-1008. [In Persian] doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2019.280543.1007915
  15. Mirzamohammadi, A., & Dozdouzani, Y. (2021). The effect of biophilic architecture on improving the environmental quality of residential complexes (Case study: Aseman Residential Complex, Tabriz). Journal of Sustainability, Development and Environment, 2(3), 85–102. [In Persian] https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jsde/Article/846632
  16. Mousavi, M., Jafarpour Ghalehteimouri, K., & Bayramzadeh, N. (2025). Assessing social infrastructure in border areas from a city prosperity perspective: a case study of border townships in West Azarbaijan Province, Iran. Discover Cities2(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44327-025-00057-3
  17. Nazemi, E., & Ghasemi, E. (2016). Explanation of strategies for promoting harmonious interaction between architectural buildings and nature with a biophilic architecture approach. Published in Biennial Conference on Contemporary Society and Architecture, Isfahan. [In Persian] https://civilica.com/doc/606869/
  18. Nouhi Benzanjani, M., & Nikpour, M. (1400). Recognizing the impact of biophilic architecture principles on people's sense of satisfaction. Published in National Conference on Architecture, Civil Engineering, Urban Development and Horizons of Islamic Art in the Second Step of the Revolution, Tabriz. [In Persian] https://civilica.com/doc/1252397
  19. Parvar, S. Z., & Karimpour, A. (2019). Analysis of the effectiveness of biophilic architecture principles on improving the quality of the man-made environment. Published in First National Conference on New Technologies in Architectural Engineering and Urban Planning of Iran, Tehran. [In Persian]  https://civilica.com/doc/1117809
  20. Rabani, T. (2012). Application of foresight and strategic thinking approaches in urban development planning. Master’s thesis, University of Tehran, Faculty of Geography. [In Persian]
  21. Russo, A., & Cirella, G. T. (2017). Biophilic Cities: Planning for Sustainable and Smart Urban Environments.
  22. Shaliha, P., Farajollahi-Rad, A., Ahmadi, V., & Shoaei, H. R. (2013). Explaining the indicators of improving the quality of conventional urban housing derived from biophilic architecture with respect to the geography of Tehran's Region One. Geography and Regional Development, 21(1), 261-296. [In Persian] doi: 10.22067/jgrd.2023.80640.1238
  23. Tardast, Z., Meshkini, A. & Rajabi, A. (2021). Explain the Strategic Planning Model of Biophilic Tourism Case Study: Tehran Metropolis. Urban Tourism, 8(2), 65-79. [In Persian] doi: 10.22059/jut.2021.299414.782
  24. Wilson, E, O. (1986). Biophilia: the Human Bond with Other Species. Cambridge: Harvard
  25. Xue, F., Gou, Z., Lau, S. S. Y., Lau, S. K., Chung, K. H., & Zhang, J. (2019). From biophilic design to biophilic urbanism: Stakeholders’ perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production211(23), 1444-1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.277