رتبه‌بندی شهری در مقیاس ملی با رویکرد اسلامی، درجستجوی مدل نظری

نوع مقاله : مقاله برگرفته از طرح پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر ومعماری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران

2 پژوهشگر دکتری شهرسازی، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران

چکیده

کلانشهرها با شاخص‌های مختلفی مورد ارزیابی قرار می‌گیرند، اما شاخص‌های مورد استفاده در نظام‌های رتبه‌بندی بومی نبوده و تاکنون از منظر فکری اسلام بدان نگریسته نشده‌است. به نظر می‌رسد رویکرد اسلامی می‌تواند مبنای مناسبی جهت رتبه‌بندی شهرها باشد. این پژوهش با هدف جستجوی مدل نظری تبیین‌کننده رتبه‌بندی شهرها از منظر اندیشه ایرانی-اسلامی تدوین شده و در پی پاسخ به سوالاتی چون مدل مفهومی تبیین‌کننده رتبه‌بندی شهری از منظر شهر ایرانی- اسلامی کدام است، می‌باشد. برای این منظور پژوهشگران روش‌های مختلف کمی و کیفی همچون مصاحبه، پرسشنامه، تحلیل کیفی و تحلیل داده‌های ثانویه را به‌کارگرفته‌اند. به منظور تدقیق مدل از مصاحبه‌های ساختاریافته و نیمه ساختاریافته و نرم‌افزار مکس کیودا استفاده شده است. جامعه متخصصان و حرفه‌مندان شامل 25 نفر از اندیشمندان و متخصصان حوزه شهرسازی اسلامی است. نتایج، حاکی از کارایی مدل خیمه بر ارکان و مولفه‌ها و شاخص‌های رتبه‌بندی شهری است. مدل مفهومی شامل 17 مقوله می‌باشد. رکن اول؛ وجه فکری- عقیدتی شهروند ایرانی مسلمان شامل 2 مقوله، رکن دوم؛ وجه معیشتی شهروند ایرانی مسلمان شامل 3 مقوله، رکن سوم؛ تعاملات شهروندی با یکدیگر شامل 4 مقوله، رکن چهارم؛ تعاملات شهر شامل 2 مقوله و رکن پنجم؛ بستر شهر شامل 5 مقوله می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Compilation of Theoretical Framework of Urban Ranking on a National Scale with Islamic Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Rafieian 1
  • Fatemeh Shams 2
  • Abolfazl Mashayekhi 3
1 Assistant Professor of Urban Planning, Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
2 Ph.D. Candidate of Urban Planning, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 Ph.D. Student of Urban Planning, Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
چکیده [English]

Metropolises are evaluated with different indicators, but the indicators used in the rating systems are not indigenous and have never been looked from Islamic point of view. It seems that the Islamic approach can be a suitable basis for ranking cities. This research was developed with the aim of searching for a theoretical model explaining the ranking of cities from the perspective of Iranian-Islamic thought and seeking answers to questions such as what is the conceptual model explaining city ranking from the perspective of the Iranian-Islamic city.
For this purpose, researchers have used various quantitative and qualitative methods such as interviews, questionnaires, qualitative analysis and secondary data analysis. In order to verify the model, structured and semi-structured interviews and Max Kyuda software were used. The community of experts and professionals includes 25 philosophers and specialists in the field of Islamic urban planning.
Two categories of factors can be identified in the conceptual model of urban ranking, horizontal and vertical factors.The first category are the factors that create the biological and spatial quality of people in every context and are used in conventional ranking indices.Meanwhile, the second part, i.e. the vertical factors, have secondary, valuable and implicit content and include rating indicators corresponding to the Iranian-Islamic thought. These factors are like warp and weft that can turn the city rating indexing device into a tent. It seems that the horizontal factors determine the explicit and universal content, and the vertical factors based on the framework of thought have a greater contribution to the implicit and value judgments of the ranking indicators. It provides an inference model of horizontal and vertical factors shaping the conceptual model of urban ranking. According to this model, the components of faith, perfection and happiness and the journey to God along with remembrance, attention and worship are among the vertical factors of the superiority of one city or biological complex over another.Originating from vertical factors, five pillars of Iranian Muslim citizen (intellectual-ideological aspect and subsistence aspect), citizen interactions, city interactions and city context can be identified.
The results indicate the effectiveness of the tent model on the pillars and components and indicators of urban ranking. The first pillar; the intellectual-ideological aspect of the Iranian Muslim citizen includes 2 categories (reminding and awareness, explanation jihad, spirituality and ethics, and scientific jihad), the second pillar; the livelihood of Iranian Muslim citizens includes 3 categories (salary, productivity and economic prosperity, health and lifestyle), the third pillar; citizen interactions with each other include 4 categories (nation solidarity and socio-political interactions, Islamic justice and governance, identity and dignity, family dignity and privacy, and the general level of satisfaction of citizens with the city), the fourth pillar; city interactions (interaction with others, Iranian Muslims in the national and international arena) including 2 categories (national and international relations and tourism and independence and synergy with other metropolises) and the fifth pillar; the bed of the city (the city, the arena of excellence of citizens) includes 5 categories (accessibility, naturalism, habitation, public spaces and resilience)

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Theoretical ranking model
  • Tabernacle theory
  • urban ranking
  • worship-oriented city
  1. Acuto, M., Pejic, D., & Briggs, J. (2021). Taking city rankings seriously: Engaging with benchmarking practices in global urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 45(2), 363–377, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12974 
  2. Afshari, S. (2021). Urban competitiveness assessment of Tehran in international and international rankings, knowledge of city no. 646, Center of Tehran Municipality's Study and Planning. (In Persian) https://rpc.tehran.ir
  3. Ashrafi, N., & Naghizadeh, M. (2017). Clarifying Interaction of Ideas and Effect in the sasanid Era Architecture. Hoviatshahr, 11(2), 95-106. (In Persian) https://hoviatshahr.srbiau.ac.ir/article_10933.html
  4. Delangizan, S., Dehghan Shabani, Z., Khanzadi, A., & Zabihidan, M. S. (2018). Determining the Indicators of Creative City and Rankings of Iranian Metropolises Based on Creative City Criteria: An Application of Modified TOPSIS Method. Journal of Urban Economics, 3(1(4)), 1-24. (In Persian)https://ue.ui.ac.ir/article_22916.html
  5. Giffinger, R., Haindlmaier, G., & Kramar, H. (2010). The role of rankings in growing city competition, Urban Research & Practice, 3(3), 299-312 . https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2010.524420
  6. Goodarzi Soroush, M., Aminzadeh Goharrizi, B., & Naghizadeh, M. (2012). Manifestation of Islamic Thought in the City with the Presence of School in the Neighborhood. Journal of Studies on Iranian Islamic City, (7), 99-108. (In Persian) https://islamicarchitecture.ir/articles
  7. Motahari, M. (1978), Recognition Issue, Sadra Publication, Tehran. (In Persian). https://noo.rs/wvsuG
  8. Naghizadeh, M. (2010). A Reflection in the Essence of the Islamic City. Journal of Studies on Iranian Islamic City, 1(1), 1-14. (InPersian). https://www.sid.ir/paper/177342/fa
  9. Najafi, M., Naghizadeh, M., Toghyani, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2021). Suggested Method for Production or Indigenization of the Iranian-Urbanism Science by Using Mystical-Ethical Text. Hoviatshahr, 15(4), 65-78. (In Persian). https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_16746.html
  10. Nedaei Toosi, S. (2021). Operational - measuring framework of cities based on Iran's urban development index, City knowledge 518, center of study and planning in Tehran, Tehran municipality. (In Persian) https://rpc.tehran.ir
  11. Raeesi, M., & Noghrekar, A. (2016). The Ontology of Meaning in Architectural Works. Hoviatshahr, 9(24), 5-16. (In Persian) https://hoviatshahr.srbiau.ac.ir/article_8782.html
  12. Rafieian, M., & Fateh Rad, M. (2015). Islamic - Iranian City; Plan for Future City, Seminar of Iranian Islamic Pattern of Progress, no. 4. (In Persian) http://noo.rs/aZc6c
  13. Rafieian, M., Rafieian, M., & Bemanian, M. R. (2022). Model of meaning relationship of "High quality public places" from Islamic-Iranian thought perspective, Iranian Islamic city studies, (44), 5-14. (In Persian) http://iic.ihss.ac.ir/Article/19992
  14. Sarhani, F., yazdani, M. H., & Amanpour, S. (2019). Ranking of Ahwaz marginal neighborhoods based on indicators of social sustainability of housing using the model ELECTRE. Urban Management Studies, 11(37), 33-45. (In Persian) https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_14665.html
  15. Tock. (2021). Which city is the greenest? A multi-dimensional deconstruction of city rankings, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101687